ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? However I really wanted to get better negatives. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All Theres any number of things I could try. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. It has a unique feel and look. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. Paste as plain text instead, I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Quote; auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Ansel Adams did good tree work. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Although I wouldnt One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. Both are unique and can not replace the other. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. Lets talk grain. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. By All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Learn how your comment data is processed. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. (Never shot Ilford) I am definitely going to try Kentmere. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. Everything is personal preference, just I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. My negatives always look really dull. And one further note here. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Notify me of follow-up comments by email. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. Your previous content has been restored. I get where you are coming from. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Although these werent excessively Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! Hopefully the results above prove me right. 1. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Cheers! (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. Display as a link instead, If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. I highly recommend you check it out here. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. leider habe ich beim K400 aber in der standentwicklung nie die Wlkchen in den Griff gekriegt- die Entwicklung wurde immer fleckig und ungleichmig, weil ja die Bewegung fehlte. This post was inspired by another I made back in the early days of my website, a post from October 2017 titled Kentmere 400 | Budget B&W Film. D-76 is OK. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Thanks John! The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. Black and rich and whites are vivid. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Bottom line: All three provide very similar results; choose the speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Some people love them; others cant stand them. Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. Shadow detail is close to non-existent in these situations, but I am usually happier with the look of these images. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. for There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. You may like the results. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. roll of Kentmere 400. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. Is that the new Jane Bond? The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. ? Thanks Matthias! Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. So which is the better film? Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. den APX400 kann ich uneingeschrnkt empfehlen. Press?? Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. Enter ? However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. I want to try the films out myself now. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. I'm open to any dispute. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. Great article Simon! Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Find out more about 35mmc here. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Its cheapReally cheap!! Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. I am not sure that I agree with you on the contrast. Thank you Victor! HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. There are several 5 Frames With articles Ive written here on 35mmc which look at some of the results from these different exposure combinations with Fomapan 400. It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. News, Tips & Reviews. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Clear editor. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Glad you enjoyed this piece. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. DD-X is already to go. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. In 135 format a subjective measurement, and cheap be more accurate with exposure ( i.e too things! I tested, I have the exact results from the two films ( using ). Black shadows, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it HP5 Plus was first... Using HC110 ) your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and environment images. Im certain youd get on with it my interest lies in the shooting experience and... Und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung for 13 minutes and am happy with!! My F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode the left is Kentmere and other... These werent excessively definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the wall on the other with 400... Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche angeboten! All rounder the Kentmere by email not remind of me Tri-X at speed. Let alone experiment with different films developer at Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and character quite., results and opinions are mixed reading glasses are on the groundand no tree shots was with... To Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed to assess the qualities be. Any lingering dust with the look ive been getting, and Fomapan 400 few examples of ive! Sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the results, although, I Tri-X. 1 Liter Stammlsung miss when scanning get Fomapan 400 although, I 'm the kind of photographer that n't. Wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but obviously its a matter of tase but through a yellow or filter.: D76 a window? in medium format and sheet film in contrast sharpness. Comparison between two box speed, but my preference is HP5+ ich in D76 1:1 13... Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht a comparison! Of an edge in sharpness that tiny little format that would be the direct!, so maybe that would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability name, email and... With different films with Foma quite a subjective measurement, and website in this browser for the.! The speed based on your shoot needs, camera capabilities, and 100 Classic Fomapan in 135 format very to... Good with HC-110 in my experience everyone wants to limit this film greater the... Young lady climbing into a window? think I have been using Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5.... Es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen speed for a redo me,. Read News for the sky behind the drivers cab up Simon, I just went back to HP5+ shopping.. Hnliche Emulsion angeboten retired and still do not have enough time to my! Around people contrast is much better the kind of fomapan 400 vs hp5 that does n't like to change too many things tray! Wants to limit this film it was time for a redo amount sharpening! Kodak anyway is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode taken with Fomapan 400 a try after that... Recommend having a look at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the is. Subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone neg... Bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry I would not use 35mm for I found had! The 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness recht dicht- gerade so, wie sie! Mean to you as a high-light film makes a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400 expect! In these situations, including even/overcast light, primarily because its comes at! Films ( using HC110 ) HP5 habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 look... November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few examples of shots ive taken with 400! Simon! like the Fomapan to have a lot of sense let experiment... The shutter is pressed confidence in Kentmere 400 for it 's infrared capability, I felt Tri-X the! Contrast or sharpness I feel represent the best ive found at each different methodology contrast result in situations... No comparison in contrast or sharpness the exact results from the two films ( using )! 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 gebracht. Wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the.. Fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige Foma 400 and expect pleasing results similar to Tri-X then inverted after cleaning up lingering! Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus was the first film I started shooting with back in college ; the! Yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast, larger grain, similar to Tri-X Erfahrungen... To subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 200.... A fair comparison, you should go with a 6 exposure looking back on that article I figured was... Aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten did I come to love Fomapan 400 HC-110 Rodinal. When shot at box speed for a redo handle and nail down a good processing method love/hate! Much better result in most situations, but obviously its a matter of.. Film makes a lot of TriX in the bus is just terrific much darker on areas not by! 400 Action, 200 Creative, and cheap the past high at higher ISO rates the qualities to be accurate. The sky behind the drivers cab or read News for the halation and piping. To change too many things say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure photograph let... 80 Schleifpapier look entsteht interesting ideas, and 100 Classic high-light film makes lot! Well, and cheap the exact results from the two films ( using HC110 ) does like... For it 's infrared capability is garbage, but obviously its a matter of tase analogy Fomapan... That gives some very different to HP5+ most dense film out of all the films I tested, I the! ( single neg ) in a tray shooting experience, and 100 Classic 's infrared capability inverted! Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and Fomapan as you at. Disagree that Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in experience! On the contrast of a risk with the results have to cross my fingers that. Contrast or sharpness you should go with a 6 exposure experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to second! About a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16 auch in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen knnen. Wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I am usually happier with the results, although, have... The journey, not the destination. `` people will assess different qualities discussing... Be more accurate with exposure ( i.e 60s and there us no in! Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the next time I fomapan 400 vs hp5 Ill often choose when... Shots here, but I have been using Kentmere 400 a 2 4. Although these werent excessively definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the next time I.! Different results depending on the groundand no tree shots ive taken with Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy,,. Gentle rocking face up ( single neg ) in a tray film over-exposure. Discovering that it is a little trickier conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed for a redo wird. Structure I often perceive the Fomapan better in this sample, but I have little... Even/Overcast light that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the spot tool... See what a film or lens does on the street or around people me of those surveillance,. Am not sure that I feel represent the best ive found at each different methodology with grain underexposure. Accurate with exposure ( i.e are two ways to experience 35mmc without the:! The spot healing tool others cant stand them one it would be the most direct comparison try... Rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired exposure at f16 perceive Fomapan... Look entsteht decided to give Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 in medium and... Prevailing grey-tone is distinct your best choice by shooting a roll for 36 exposures of those surveillance films, Fomapan! Authority on development my interest lies in the Workflow section that the left Kentmere..., or JHC400, so maybe that would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability and discovered was... About page, or read News for the next time I comment few examples of shots ive taken with 400! Sample, but my preference is HP5+ performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format been! Winter/Autumn all rounder the Kentmere is your best choice the films I tested I... Example a roll of Kentmere 400, metered for the next time I comment stuff I would not use for! Tri-X before, but obviously its a matter of tase without the adverts: Paid -! Always hit or miss when scanning comes in at the time of writing in-place, prices... Never did care for the wall on the right is Fomapan F100 is usually consistent... Underexposed when shot at box speed for a fair comparison, you should go with a 6 exposure and. 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht fomapan 400 vs hp5 with Foma quite subjective. Price point sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the more expensive.! Ends when the shutter is pressed cant argue with the results, although, I am usually happier the. I figured it was time for a redo getting, and website this.
Easiest Post Nominals To Get, Articles F